Implementation, training, support, governance, and enterprise adoption.
Dify-ready agent systems with the policy layer attached.
CREATE SOMETHING packages Dify as the visible agent runtime, MCP as the tool boundary, and Policy OS as the approval, runbook, and evidence layer.
Templates, plugins, and repeatable Dify plus MCP solutions.
The first affiliate economics milestone after Dify accepts the application.
Dify proof should be visible without exposing private traces.
The lane works when buyers can see the app shape, tool boundary, eval posture, and delivery evidence.
A public Dify guide agent backed by read-only MCP cards and trust catalog evidence instead of private traces.
A Dify-backed delivery surface with agent inventory, eval coverage, and production-oriented evidence controls.
A repeatable Dify plus MCP workflow pattern for turning media intake into structured operating records.
A Dify-supported marketplace workflow that keeps review context, tool access, and policy boundaries inspectable.
The same Dify lane serves builders, operators, and agencies.
Each audience sees a concrete path instead of a generic chatbot pitch.
Start with MCP server cards, Dify DSL snapshots, smoke checks, and setup steps that a new user can run.
Policy OS defines what can run, what needs a human, what stops, and what evidence gets recorded.
Turn proven workflows into templates, plugin candidates, client-safe case studies, and affiliate-ready content.
Teach the control plane before asking for trust.
The guide cluster explains the operating model, validates the workflow, and routes buyers to the right next action.
Explain how Dify becomes the visible agent surface while MCPs carry tool access and Policy OS carries boundaries.
Agent eval gatesShow API health, expected tool use, forbidden tool use, secret refusal, latency, and write confirmation checks.
Ship a Dify app with MCP toolsTurn one workflow into a Dify app with scoped MCP tools, approvals, eval gates, and proof.
Custom-domain content engineKeep canonical Dify articles, disclosures, analytics, and partner handoff on the agency domain.
Dify vs n8nUse the layer comparison when buyers are deciding between automation and agent apps.
The useful proof is repo-owned and sanitized.
Dify DSL snapshots, MCP coverage, trust catalogs, and Policy OS artifacts make the system reviewable without leaking client-private records.
Codified Dify agents, server cards, manifests, DSL snapshots, and eval references.
Coverage states for ready, intake-ready, brokered, dormant, and missing Dify MCP cards.
Public proof that intentionally excludes raw traces, private hubs, and credential references.
Approvals, runbooks, golden tasks, tuning, and escalation packaged as the operating rule.
The lane is conservative until Dify accepts it.
The public page should separate implementation proof from affiliate, marketplace, and partner claims that require approval.
The page can show readiness and proof without implying Dify has accepted the application.
Affiliate routing waits for acceptance, disclosures, and declared surfaces.
Public proof excludes Braintrust traces, hub records, broad connector surfaces, and secrets.
Bring one Dify workflow that needs control.
I’ll map the app surface, MCP boundary, eval gates, approval states, and evidence path before the workflow becomes a production agent.
Visible workflow and user-facing agent surface.
Scoped tools, resources, and setup details.
Approval states, blocked states, evals, and evidence.