Technical review of an existing project
Your product works in a demo. You need to know what could fail when a customer uses it. We review the code and one agreed customer workflow, then help you decide what needs attention now.
Discuss your existing projectReview scope, price, and timing are agreed before paid work starts.
Bring the project you built with AI, the feature you are stuck on, or the request a customer just made. We start with your existing tools and code. If a change is needed, we explain why.
This is for founders and teams who need technical judgment before making a commitment. You can keep developing the product while we review the agreed part of it.
One connected system. Only the selected part will open. This model illustrates a scoped review, not a finding about your product.
Start with the product you already have. The neighboring parts stay in place while we focus on one agreed customer workflow.
Show us the product, the customer journey, and your concern. We agree on access, scope, deliverables, price, and timing. The fit call does not include a code audit.
We review the relevant code and test the agreed workflow. Depending on the scope, checks may cover access to records, AI output, failed requests, or the customer requirement you need to answer.
You receive a written findings report and a walkthrough: what to fix before the pilot, what can wait, and what to leave alone. Each finding includes the evidence, its limits, and a recommended next action.
The highlighted connection is an illustrative finding. Repairs require a separately agreed implementation scope.
You keep the report and any tests or instructions created for your project. Fixes, additional reviews, and launch work require a separate agreed scope.
Illustrative findings report
This fictional example shows the format for a customer portal. It is not a client result or a finding about your product.
Fix before the pilot
Example evidence: In the test environment, a request from account A returned a file belonging to account B.
Next action: Enforce account access on the server and repeat the test with both accounts. This check covers the tested file route; other routes remain unreviewed.
Improve later
Example evidence: Single-file export worked in the agreed pilot journey. Bulk export was outside the pilot requirements.
Next action: Keep the manual step for this pilot. Revisit it if customer volume or requirements change.
Leave alone for now
Example evidence: The agreed small-volume test completed on the existing host.
Next action: Keep the host for this pilot. This does not establish capacity at a higher load.
It gives you evidence about the work we agreed to inspect. It is not a security certification, a full penetration test, or a guarantee that a customer will approve your product. Broader security, compliance, and performance work need their own scope and, where needed, a specialist.
We quote the review after the fit conversation. The quote names the work, deliverables, timing, and exclusions. There is no automatic implementation project or support subscription.
We can scope implementation after the findings are clear. Agree on the tasks, capacity, and working arrangements before that work starts. You keep ownership of your code.
No. Control starts at $900/month for agreed post-launch operations. A prelaunch review and product development are quoted separately.
Start with a demo, a short description of the problem, and any customer requirement or deadline. We agree on repository access after discussing fit. Do not put credentials or private customer records in booking notes.
Discuss your existing projectNeed something built from scratch? See Agent Foundation.