For teams of 5-50

Your tools do not talk to each other. Your team fills the gap.

Start with the workflow that wastes the most time. CREATE SOMETHING maps the manual bridge, builds the first safe wedge, and leaves your operator with a control path they can understand.

Start
One painful workflow

Name the handoff that steals the most time before adding more automation.

Build
A scoped workflow wedge

Connect the source systems, write the rules, and keep authority constrained.

Keep
Code, policy, and runbook

The operator keeps the map, the control boundary, and the evidence needed to trust it.

Operating path

Do not re-platform. Remove one manual bridge.

The buyer does not need a full-stack rebuild on the first call. They need to see which handoff can be mapped, delegated, stopped, and proven.

01
Map the manual bridge

Identify the team member, tool, record, and decision that currently hold the workflow together.

02
Connect only the first wedge

Use the smallest useful connection point instead of rebuilding every system at once.

03
Add decision states

Separate allowed actions, approval-needed actions, and blocked states before delegation.

04
Operate with receipts

Leave a runbook, recovery path, and evidence trail so the workflow can survive handoff.

Service shape

The offer expands only after the first wedge proves useful.

One controlled workflow becomes the evidence for the next map, not a promise to automate everything at once.

Workflow Wedge
2-4 week implementation

A scoped first build for one high-value workflow. Typical range: $2,000-$5,000.

  • Connectivity
  • Setup
  • Policy
  • Runbook
System Map
Roadmap after proof

Map tools, workflows, and data flow after the first wedge proves value. Typical range: $5,000-$10,000.

  • Duplication
  • Manual movement
  • Disconnected records
  • Priority order
Reliability
Ongoing control layer

Prompt tuning, policy updates, monitoring, and edge-case handling once the workflow is in operation.

  • Drift checks
  • Approval rules
  • Performance review
  • Recovery notes
Example

A small team can feel the difference without changing every tool.

A professional-services team can start with one pipeline handoff, then use the evidence to decide what deserves the next connection.

Month 1
HubSpot pipeline wedge

MCP endpoint, Codex setup, approval policy, and runbook for a professional-services workflow.

  • Saves 5 hrs/week
  • $3,000 build
Month 3
System audit

Found three disconnected systems and roughly twenty hours per week of manual data movement.

  • Prioritized roadmap
  • $7,500 audit
Month 4
Second connection

Connected Notion project tracking and added a shared control layer across both workflows.

  • 15 hrs/week automated
  • $2,500/mo operation
Fit

This is for teams carrying too much workflow in people.

The right first buyer can name the repeated handoff, the person currently rebuilding context, and the business consequence when that handoff breaks.

Operator gap
Your team is the integration layer

People move context between HubSpot, Notion, Slack, spreadsheets, and inboxes.

AI gap
AI is not near the real work

The agent can draft, but it cannot safely act against the systems that matter.

Scale gap
Zapier-style glue hit the wall

The workflow now needs ownership, approval rules, and recovery paths, not another trigger.

Start with one workflow

Bring the workflow that wastes the most time.

I will help map the first safe wedge before expanding authority, scope, or spend.

Bring One workflow

The handoff, owner, source tools, and failure point.

Map First safe wedge

The smallest useful delegation boundary.

Leave with A control path

Allowed, approval-needed, blocked, and receipt states.